最終更新日:2022/12/24
Seller of used car, who had fraudulently represented to buyer that the vehicle identification number (VIN) had been scratched out under windshield because former owner had been trying to prevent repossession of the car, was liable to buyer for punitive damages, based on having acted willfully or with reckless disregard for the consequences of the seller's conduct, even if the seller had not known the car had been chop shopped
from two different vehicles.
編集履歴(0)
元となった例文
Seller
of
used
car,
who
had
fraudulently
represented
to
buyer
that
the
vehicle
identification
number
(VIN)
had
been
scratched
out
under
windshield
because
former
owner
had
been
trying
to
prevent
repossession
of
the
car,
was
liable
to
buyer
for
punitive
damages,
based
on
having
acted
willfully
or
with
reckless
disregard
for
the
consequences
of
the
seller's
conduct,
even
if
the
seller
had
not
known
the
car
had
been
"chop
shopped"
from
two
different
vehicles.