最終更新日:2022/12/24
There was a time when this Court’s precedents may have portended the kind of First Amendment liability for purely private property owners that the majority spends so much time rejecting. […] But the Court soon stanched that trend. See Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U. S. 551, 561–567 (1972) (cabining Marsh and refusing to extend Logan Valley); Hudgens v. NLRB, 424 U. S. 507, 518 (1976) (making clear that “the rationale of Logan Valley did not survive” Lloyd).
編集履歴(0)
元となった例文
There
was
a
time
when
this
Court’s
precedents
may
have
portended
the
kind
of
First
Amendment
liability
for
purely
private
property
owners
that
the
majority
spends
so
much
time
rejecting.
[…]
But
the
Court
soon
stanched
that
trend.
See
Lloyd
Corp.
v.
Tanner,
407
U.
S.
551,
561–567
(1972)
(cabining
Marsh
and
refusing
to
extend
Logan
Valley);
Hudgens
v.
NLRB,
424
U.
S.
507,
518
(1976)
(making
clear
that
“the
rationale
of
Logan
Valley
did
not
survive”
Lloyd).