Some scholars believe the Tibetic and Burmic divisions to be premature and that for the present their subdivisions (such as Bodish, Himalayish, Kirantish, Burmish, Kachinish, Kukish) should be considered as the classificatory peaks around which the Sino-Tibetan languages group themselves as members or more or less distant relatives.

How could one only true end-time apostle contradict another only true end-time apostle? If one had restored the truth, how could another unrestore that same truth?

Night, y'all! Thanks for a great evening!

Essays are written on causes—they might be more pithily turned on consequences.