最終更新日:2022/12/24
In particular we will exclude the notion of “observable” in favour of that of “beable”. The beables of the theory are those elements which might correspond to elements of reality, to things which exist. Their existence does not depend on “observation”. Indeed observation and observers must be made out of beables. I use the term “beable” rather than some more committed term like “being” or “beer” to recall the essentially tentative nature of any physical theory. Such a theory is at best a candidate for the description of nature. Terms like “being”, “beer”, “existent”, etc., would seem to me lacking in humility. In fact “beable” is short for “maybe-able”.
編集履歴(0)
元となった例文
In
particular
we
will
exclude
the
notion
of
“observable”
in
favour
of
that
of
“beable”.
The
beables
of
the
theory
are
those
elements
which
might
correspond
to
elements
of
reality,
to
things
which
exist.
Their
existence
does
not
depend
on
“observation”.
Indeed
observation
and
observers
must
be
made
out
of
beables.
I
use
the
term
“beable”
rather
than
some
more
committed
term
like
“being”
or
“beer”
to
recall
the
essentially
tentative
nature
of
any
physical
theory.
Such
a
theory
is
at
best
a
candidate
for
the
description
of
nature.
Terms
like
“being”,
“beer”,
“existent”,
etc.,
would
seem
to
me
lacking
in
humility.
In
fact
“beable”
is
short
for
“maybe-able”.