The following paradox (and also axiom) of material implication: P→(Q→P) could be taken to mean the monotonicity of entailment, that is, if 'P' is true then no other or new fact 'Q' should be able to arise which would imply the nullification of P's truth, i.e., it could not be the case, for any 'Q', that Q → ¬P.

Not only did the Dublin barkeeps not make a shamrock in the foam, they claimed to not even know what a black and tan was.

Not a few — maybe most — hold its eating contests, roller coaster and skeeball in high regard.

The cause is a temperate conglutination ; for both bodies are clammy and viscous , and do bridle the deflux of humours to the hurts , without penning them in too much