最終更新日:2022/12/24
The condition of Scribonius’ text thus raises nagging doubts about the authenticity of “o bone deus.” But even if the digression itself could be accepted as genuine, the situation does not improve, for the near uniqueness of Scribonius’ “o bone deus” makes it vulnerable to any number of possible accidents of transmission. Under these conditions it seems we are forced to set Scribonius aside as a non liquet.
編集履歴(0)
元となった例文
The
condition
of
Scribonius’
text
thus
raises
nagging
doubts
about
the
authenticity
of
“o
bone
deus.”
But
even
if
the
digression
itself
could
be
accepted
as
genuine,
the
situation
does
not
improve,
for
the
near
uniqueness
of
Scribonius’
“o
bone
deus”
makes
it
vulnerable
to
any
number
of
possible
accidents
of
transmission.
Under
these
conditions
it
seems
we
are
forced
to
set
Scribonius
aside
as
a
non
liquet.