In other words, Margolis's critical account of archism is motivated by the belief that no one has ever managed to show that the possibility of meaningful discourse truly presupposes a commitment to the archist's thesis, and that discourses must be constrained by such factors the conforming to which the archist introduces as necessary, such as to the principle of noncontradiction. Margolis challenges the alleged authority of this position by outlining an an-archist philosophy, which maintains that reality may be a flux, that is, lacking invariant structure or lacking necessarilty invariant structure, and that rational thought need not invoke such invariances.

Beddoes proved unquenchable and totally snubproof. Moreover he had very irritating conversational mannerisms like laying his forefinger along his nose when he was about to say something which he thought very knowing; […]

[…] and, moreover, it is subject to syntagmatic segmental processes which can morphologize the prosodic accent location (vowel lengthening as in the first three examples and rearticulation of the secondary stressed vowel as in the fourth).

As hoot he was and lecherous as a sparwe, With scalled browes blake and piled berd