But let it be recollected, that it was the case of an information for intrusion into the lands of the crown, which ex vi termini makes it probable, that the premises lay in a county at large, and not in a town; and therefore, that the case regarded a county Grand Jury. But that is put out of all doubt by the enlightened argument of Mr. Townsend who referred us to Higgins's case, Raym. 486. S. C. Ventr. where it appears, that Blunt's case was a case in a county at large and not in a corporation