The physics of elementary particles in the 20th century was distinguished by the observation of particles whose existence had been predicted by theorists sometimes decades earlier.

How can we prove nonconsequence – that something does not follow? Or even that some set of premises are inconsistent with each other – that they are unsatisfiable, and therefore, logically, everything follows?

We are the bristlers, the easily hurt and hostile, the solitary ones, the people are bums man, the don't let anyone know woman.

Upon the table More kuacks and quips there be than I am able To catalogise in this verse of mine :