最終更新日:2022/12/24
This may be contrasted with the position in the United States where, following the decision of the Supreme Court in Miranda v Arizona 384 US 436 (1964). the police are obliged to inform an arrested person of his right to legal counsel during police questioning. Failure to 'Mirandise' an arrested person renders inadmissible in evidence any statement or confession made during police questioning.
編集履歴(0)
元となった例文
This
may
be
contrasted
with
the
position
in
the
United
States
where,
following
the
decision
of
the
Supreme
Court
in
Miranda
v
Arizona
384
US
436
(1964).
the
police
are
obliged
to
inform
an
arrested
person
of
his
right
to
legal
counsel
during
police
questioning.
Failure
to
'Mirandise'
an
arrested
person
renders
inadmissible
in
evidence
any
statement
or
confession
made
during
police
questioning.