In this way, the sociological view appropriate to the Marxist theory of law became a pseudosociology […]

Since the experience differs from person to person, it seems like everyone has a different tale of electrocution, wrenching, and general burnination to share.

[…] kepe that the lustes choke not the word of God that is sowen in vs,

The respective statements are packaged differently, as direct accusations or insinuations, as topoi of threats (argumenta ad baculum or argumenta ad hominem) and occur in many contexts, especially in semi-public ones, i.e. in interviews or in TV discussions just as in the memorial vigil (see below). Greed, dishonesty and vindictiveness constitute the content prejudices appearing in this context, not least in the linguistic form of fallacious argumenta ad hominem.