On another surveillance flight I accompanied a prominent pollie of the day, a big, bluff, ruddy-faced Minister.
But it's far worse for me, said Edmund, because you'll at least have a room of your own and I shall have to share a bedroom with that record stinker, Eustace.
Hang him, poor cuckoldy knave! I know him not.
One [metaphor] in particular – the arborescent schema – emerges as perhaps the most long-held, dominant approach and way of thinking in such areas as philosophy, psychoanalysis, social criticism, and everyday life. It is, in plain, a tree-like representation of the world, which gathers concepts and images that encourage our minds to think of the world in terms of trees and their component parts. […] Deleuze and Guattari draw attention to the arborescent schemas in philosophy and other areas and show how these foundational ideas are rarely challenged, even though they limit the manoeuvrability of thought and violently organize all subsequent lines of inquiry. […] The problem with arborescent thinking is that thoughts must begin from the trunk, and refer back to it; they cannot pop up elsewhere.
