復習用の問題
For example, we want to be able to stipulate in the lexical entry for persuade simply that it takes an NP and a clausal Complement (…). From the meaning of persuade, it will follow that the clausal Complement cannot be interrogative or exclamative. From independent word-order restrictions (an NP Complement must be positioned immediately adjacent to its sister V), it will follow that an NP Complement must precede the clausal Complement. Given that both Exceptional Clauses and Small Clauses must immediately follow a transitive Verb, it will follow that the clausal Complement of persuade cannot be an S or an SC, but rather must be an S-bar. Given that S-bar can be either finite or infinitival, we should expect to find that in the unmarked case, either type of clausal Complement is possible with persuade: and examples such as the following suggest that this is correct: (64) (a) Mary persuaded John _(Sʼ) [_C that] he should resign (b) Mary persuaded John [_(Sʼ) [_C e] PRO to resign]
- 項目の編集権限を持つユーザー - すべてのユーザー
- 項目の新規作成を審査する
- 項目の編集を審査する
- 項目の削除を審査する
- 重複の恐れのある項目名の追加を審査する
- 項目名の変更を審査する
- 審査に対する投票権限を持つユーザー - 編集者
- 決定に必要な投票数 - 1
- 例文の編集権限を持つユーザー - すべてのユーザー
- 例文の削除を審査する
- 審査に対する投票権限を持つユーザー - 編集者
- 決定に必要な投票数 - 1
- 問題の編集権限を持つユーザー - すべてのユーザー
- 審査に対する投票権限を持つユーザー - 編集者
- 決定に必要な投票数 - 1